Online Network
Follow campaign updates on:
facebook twitter youtube text messages

Search

Archives:

  • July 2011
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
    • Share

    84 Reasons To Not Vote for Charlie Melancon

    October 11, 2010

    Since my opponent Charlie Melancon has voted with President Obama’s big government, big spending agenda at least 84 percent of the time, I thought it would be helpful to Louisianians to see 84 reasons why Melancon is not putting Louisianians ahead of Washington as usual. I’ve included some of your ideas as well. To share your idea, post it on my Facebook page.

    Reason #1: Melancon opposes repealing Obamacare: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34985.html

    The day after Obamacare was passed into law, I offered a bill to repeal it in the U.S. Senate.  I also support a proposal in the House that would force a vote on the repeal of Obamacare over the objections of Charlie Melancon’s ally Nancy Pelosi (Melancon has voted with Pelosi 93 percent of the time).

    Reason # 2: (From Jan on Facebook): “Scared to hold town hall meetings.”

    Jan is correct. Last summer, when so many Louisianians wanted to have their voices heard about their concerns about Obamacare, Charlie Melancon was missing in action. I held more than 20 health care town hall meeting last August alone. Click here to see a web video I put together last summer to highlight Melancon’s hiding on health care.

    Reason # 3: (From Clifford on Facebook): “Nancy Pelosi….that’s reason enough.”

    As Clifford points out, Charlie voted for San Francisco liberal Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House on three separate occasions.

    Reason # 4: He has voted to for every single Wall Street bailout.

    Reason # 5: (From Troy on Facebook): “Charlie Melancon was quoted in a media interview as saying the Stanford victims “should maybe have known better” and that it was “too good to be true” (5% CD’s versus 7% CD’s).”

    Troy is referring to a WWL interview where Melancon insulted thousands of Louisiana victims who lost their savings in the Stanford Ponzi Scheme.

    Read more and watch the interview here.

    Reason # 7: Troy’s comment reminded me about another interview where Melancon told a CNN anchor that the oil spill was being overplayed. I could not believe he said that as we were all trying to explain to the rest of the country how bad the oil spill was affecting our marshes and our economy.

    You can watch the CNN clip here.

    Congressman Melancon was quoted in a media interview as saying the Stanford people “should maybe have known better” and that it was “too good to be true” (5% CD’s versus 7% CD’s). What he was thinking when he said this I cannot say, but I do know that these people did not know better and did not believe it was too good to be true.

    Reason # 8: (From Gary on Facebook): “Melancon’s committee votes allowed a lot of second chances for abortion loopholes and special considerations into the final health care bill.”

    Reason # 9: (From Kathy on Facebook): “Flip-flop-flip-flop-flip-flop.”

    Reason #10: Melancon voted for the Auto Bailout.

    Reason #11: Melancon talks a big game about wanting grassroots debates, but when a grassroots organization invited him to debate the issues impacting Louisiana families, Melancon flat out stated he wants nothing to do with the Tea Party and won’t accept any of their debate offers.  I’m attending the Red River Tea Party debate in Shreveport on Sept. 16, but Melancon refused to go.

    Reason #12: (Andy on Facebook): “[Melancon] is an empty suit.”

    Reason #13: (Joey on Faceboook): “How about Melancon’s “Take their toys and go home” analysis? No one in the oil patch will forget that comment.”

    Here’s the quote Joey is referring to:

    “…the people that have been and worked in this industry and for this industry and supported it, it’s now kind of like, okay, you screwed up our gulf,  you screwed up our marshes, and now you say just because they want to shut you down for a short period of time, you take your toys and you’re going to go somewhere else.” (MSNBC Interview, 6/4/10)

    Reason #14: Melancon said he didn’t even want to be in this race for Senate.

    “Before deciding to get into the race challenging Republican U.S. Sen. David Vitter, Democratic U.S. Rep Charlie Melancon says he spent “the better part of a year” trying to find someone else to challenge the incumbent.” (The Daily Advertiser, 9/21/10)

    Hmmm….kind of makes you wonder…

    Reason #15: (Robert on Facebook): “Charlie won’t make a stand on ANYTHING in public but he’ll sure lick the boots of his masters in committee won’t he?”

    Reason #16: (Kevin on Facebook):We cannot afford to have Democrats remain in charge of the White House, Congress and the Senate. Southern democrats especially try and convince you that they are fiscal conservatives. That BS!”

    Reason #17: I received the highly sought-after endorsement of the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, which is a majority Democrat group.

    Reason #18: (Yvonne on Facebook): “Melancon is not a leader, he’s a follower. We need a leader!”

    Reason #19: (Julie from Facebook):Charlie Melancon voted NO on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections. The potential for fraud is too great in any election, much less one of national importance, for a photo ID not to be required.”

    Reason # 20: I received the endorsement of National Right to Life.

    National Right to Life rated me 100% in the 110th Congress. They rated Melancon 42%.

    Reason #21: (Margie on Facebook): “Melancon’s ad says he votes for Louisianians. Well, everything I saw he voted for was opposite what I wanted.”

    Reason #22: (Renee from Facebook): “Vitter votes for small business and Melancon doesn’t! The rubber meets the road with actual votes and not rhetoric!”

    Thanks Renee!

    Reason #23: (Paige from Facebook): ”Melancon=Mistake!!!! [Senator] Vitter, you have worked so tirelessly for the people…You have our entire family’s vote!”

    Thanks Paige!

    Reason #24: (Stanley from Facebook): “If I would vote for Meloncon I would be voting against my kids future.”

    Reason #25: The Gun Owners of America gave Melancon C. They gave me an A+. The Gun Owners of American have also endorsed me.

    Reason #26: I’m endorsed by the NRA

    Reason #27: (Constance from Facebook): “I don’t think we can risk Charlie Melancon in another office. Obama bought and paid for!”

    Reason #28: Melancon voted to make it easier for illegals to get actual welfare checks.

    Reason #29: Melancon voted to make it easier for illegals to get taxpayer-funded benefits.

    Reason #30: Melancon voted against allowing police to arrest and detain illegals.

    Comments Off
    • Share

    A Message from Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser

    October 6, 2010

    Listen to the audio version of Parish President Billy Nungesser’s message by following this link.

    I’m Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser, and I want you to know that what Charlie Melancon is saying about David Vitter and the oil disaster is a load of “you know what.”

    I’m endorsing David Vitter for U.S. Senate, and so are Democrats and Republicans all along the coast.

    David Vitter worked around the clock to help provide leadership during the disaster.

    David Vitter authored emergency legislation to hold BP fully accountable for all of the damages without limit. And he fought the Obama bureaucracy for more boom and to get our barrier island plan moving.

    Please join me in voting for David Vitter for U.S. Senate on November 2.

    Billy Nungesser

    Comments Off
    home | about david | issues | news | act now | interact | donate | blog | search | contact
    Paid for by David Vitter for U.S. Senate